Risk Tolerance: What Is It? Why Is It Important?
When I think of risk and the markets, I’m reminded of one of my favorite Mark Twain quotes: “October: This is one of the peculiarly dangerous months to speculate in stocks. The others are July, January, September, April, November, May, March, June, December, August, and February.”
Although I can’t help but laugh, I don’t doubt that some people feel this way about investing. It’s easy to think of the market as highly speculative when recalling the turmoil of the dot-com bubble in 2001, the subprime housing crisis of 2007-2009, and the recent volatility last year with COVID-19. Pile on the round-the-clock media coverage of the market’s every move that at times stokes feelings of apprehension, and suddenly the thought of risk and investing can be frightening. Fear of risk even seems reasonable. On the contrary, that fear is dangerous as it can prevent you from investing in the manner needed to achieve your goals. Said differently, a proper understanding of risk and, more importantly, knowing your risk tolerance is essential to achieving your goals.
Risk Tolerance vs. Risk Capacity
To understand risk tolerance, we first need to distinguish it from risk capacity. Risk tolerance can be thought of as your willingness to take risks. It’s your attitudes and beliefs. Risk capacity, on the other hand, is the ability to take risks or withstand losses. It’s your resources relative to your goals.
“… tolerance relates to an individual’s emotional limit of acceptable risk; capacity refers to the financial capacity to withstand market losses. These two factors are not necessarily correlated. For example, it is not uncommon to find an investor with significant assets and modest demands on those assets such that a significant market loss would not affect the ability to maintain the individual’s desired quality of life (i.e., high-risk capacity). However, that same investor might be unwilling to invest any significant portion of the portfolio in stock and might well bail out of whatever stock allocation there was in a significant bear market (i.e., low-risk tolerance). As a consequence, questions regarding capacity are more important for general planning purposes but are not relevant for evaluating tolerance.” (1)
When markets are doing well, risk is irrelevant and risk tolerance is infinite. It’s only when the market is falling that risk becomes important. Investors too often make the mistake of panicking in a bear market and selling their investments at depressed prices. They effectively buy high and sell low, locking in losses that can be irreversibly damaging to their goals. For that reason, we believe the most practical definition of risk tolerance to be the moment right before you call us and say, “I can’t stand it anymore; sell me out.”
How do we evaluate risk tolerance?
While we use a well-known and widely-used traditional risk survey, FinaMetrica, most of our evaluation is done through conversations with you and our Risk Tolerance Questionnaire (RTQ). Although the RTQ is a formal questionnaire that can be completed individually, we work through it with clients and use it as an educational tool to facilitate discussion about how each of us thinks about risk and investing.
Our entire process is grounded in the idea that each of our clients has a unique perspective on risk. To understand these perspectives, we use the insights into behavioral finance to provide explanations for why people make the decisions that they do.
“People are strange. There is no more apparent example than the psychology of risk. People in general and clients, in particular, have difficulty distinguishing between knowledge-based risk and foolhardy speculation. As an example, investors grossly overestimate their knowledge and, even when provided with good data, they are poor mathematicians of probability.
Investors also have difficulty estimating the risk of future events. They are much more comfortable with short-term events in which they have more intuitive confidence in their knowledge. This results in a tendency to overstate their personal risk-taking propensity.” (2)
Behavioral finance recognizes that we have limitations in processing large amounts of information, thus impacting our decision-making. To overcome these limitations, we use heuristics to simplify decisions. Heuristics are mental shortcuts, also known as rules of thumb, based on our experiences. They’re helpful in making quick and adequate decisions but can also lead to biases that result in harmful decisions when used inappropriately.
“By understanding the nature of heuristics, [we are] able to better understand the underlying issues influencing a client’s risk tolerance. Also, [we are] more effective in assisting [our clients} to modify misleading heuristics, as well as becoming a better educator and guide [for] our clients in the useful application of these mental shortcuts.” (3)
A common heuristic that creates a harmful perspective about risk is availability bias. This mental shortcut uses recent and easily recalled information to draw conclusions. A classic example of this bias is an individual who is fearful of risk because he or she easily remembers markets falling last year with the onset of COVID-19, and is engulfed in the round-the-clock media coverage of the market’s day-to-day movements. By addressing this bias and any others that may be harmful, we help our clients form reasonable perceptions of risk. Finally, with a common understanding of risk, we can then properly evaluate risk tolerance and invest in a manner in which our clients are most likely to remain committed.
Identifying and working through the flaws in our thinking helps us avoid common traps that create harmful or unrealistic expectations that stop us from achieving our goals.
Connect with an advisor today to learn more about your risk tolerance.
Sources
- Evensky, Harold, Stephen M. Horan, and Thomas R. Robinson. The New Wealth Management: The Financial Advisor’s Guide to Managing and Investing Client Assets. Hoboken, NJ: J. Wiley, 2011. 57.
- Evensky, Harold, Stephen M. Horan, and Thomas R. Robinson. The New Wealth Management: The Financial Advisor’s Guide to Managing and Investing Client Assets. Hoboken, NJ: J. Wiley, 2011. 59.
- Evensky, Harold, Stephen M. Horan, and Thomas R. Robinson. The New Wealth Management: The Financial Advisor’s Guide to Managing and Investing Client Assets. Hoboken, NJ: J. Wiley, 2011. 59.
Categories
Recent Insights
-
The Balancing Act: Navigating Mid-Mom Phase and Office Priorities
Finding Balance in Career and Motherhood Work-life balance—does anyone ever truly achieve it? Probably not, but with each season of life, we find ways to make it work for the present moment. As a mother of five with a full-time career in financial advising, I’ve learned that the concept of balance is often more about…
-
Financially Ever After? Exploring the Dollars and Cents of Marriage for Same-Sex Couples
Since the landmark 2015 Supreme Court decision legalizing same-sex marriage nationwide, LGBTQ couples have gained equal access to the financial benefits and considerations that come with marriage. However, the decision to marry involves complex financial implications that deserve careful consideration. Let’s explore whether it makes financial sense for same-sex couples to get married by examining…
-
Stuck in the Middle: Life as a Sandwich Generation Caregiver
Psst! Over here, down here in between the sliced bread, lettuce, tomato, cheese, and deli meat. Yes, that’s right, I am in the sandwich generation! This term was coined in the early ’80s to describe individuals sandwiched between raising their children and caring for aging parents. We juggle our careers, home responsibilities, and family caregiving…
-
Talk Your Chart | Fed Rate Cuts, Weak Recession Signals, and a Bull Market in Slow Motion| Episode 61
In Episode 61 of Talk Your Chart, Brett and Marcos explore the latest on the Dogs of the Dow, Utilities’ surprising rise, and Constellation Energy’s nuclear power dominance. Dive into the current bull market, Fed rate cuts, inflation signals, and why recession indicators remain weak.