Death of the Em Dash: What “AI Slop” Is Actually Telling Us About Content 

What Is AI Slop, Really?

Have you ever scrolled past a perfectly formatted article and felt… nothing?

That low-grade disengagement is what many are calling “AI slop.” The critique is predictable: too polished, too structured, too clean. Too many em dashes. Too many tidy paragraphs. A tone that feels suspiciously curated.

But that framing misses what’s actually happening.

AI didn’t invent this style.

It learned it — from marketers, content strategists, and professional writers who spent years refining how to communicate effectively in a digital environment. And as one of those O.G. content strategists from the post-SEO, pre-AI competitive hellscape, I can confirm: we were using the em dash before it was cool.

This isn’t about punctuation.

It’s about expectation.

2.     The Content Boom

Before dedicated marketing teams, content wasn’t “too polished.” It was inconsistent, underdeveloped, or never published at all.

Those of us figuring this out circa 2019 spent years testing how people actually read online. Clean formatting. Strong hooks. Lists. Structured paragraphs. Yes, em dashes. These weren’t aesthetic choices. They were usability decisions.

Then AI entered the ecosystem.

Suddenly, the structural patterns that once signaled expertise became instantly replicable.

AI didn’t lower the bar.

It raised the floor.

Clear writing is no longer a differentiator. It’s table stakes.

3.     Pattern Recognition and the Marketing Cycle

The backlash isn’t about AI. It’s about pattern recognition.

Marketing has always moved in cycles:

• Hashtags boosted discovery, then became clutter.
• Emojis added personality, then became decorative noise.
• Listicles and punchy hooks drove engagement, then became predictable.

Now tone and structure are cycling through the same arc. What once signaled quality now signals familiarity. And in a saturated environment, familiarity feels like “another pitch.”

4.     Our Attention Became a Commodity

Between sponsored TikTok posts that somehow know what you’ve needed since adolescence and targeted ads that have been tracking you since you were ranking your friends on MySpace, we’ve adapted.

We scroll fast.

We filter faster.

Corporate content on LinkedIn doesn’t lose attention because of punctuation. It loses attention because readers assume they already know where it’s going.

That assumption is the real problem.

A Harsh Truth: People Never Wanted to Read Your Content in the First Place

Think about it. How many automated emails in your inbox do you actually look forward to? One or two at most. You stick with them because they help you make decisions, answer a real question, or provide insight that feels relevant to your life or work.

Most marketing content doesn’t do that. And that’s not a failure — it’s a reality. The majority of organizational updates, event recaps, or service-focused posts aren’t designed to captivate. They’re meant to inform, signal, or document. That type of content has an audience — peers, clients, or industry insiders — but it will almost never “go viral,” regardless of formatting choices.

Different Content Serves Different Purposes

This is where expectations get messy. Not all content has the same job. Some content exists for search visibility: to capture a specific query and provide a clear answer. Some exists to convert paid traffic that’s already been directed to it. Some exists to maintain credibility with peers or clients who care about updates, networking, or fundraising.

When we treat all content as if it should perform the same way organically, frustration follows. Low engagement isn’t necessarily a signal of failure — it’s often a mismatch between audience, purpose, and expectation.

Distribution Matters — Whether You Like It or Not

Even thoughtful, highly relevant content can go unseen. Visibility is no longer determined by insight alone; it’s influenced by promotion, budget, and platform algorithms. The content that “wins” is often not the most original or insightful — it’s the one that reaches the right people at the right time.

This isn’t a flaw of AI, or em dashes, or formatting. It’s the reality of a saturated landscape. If content underperforms, the reasons are usually simple:

1. It isn’t reaching the right audience.
2. It isn’t valuable enough for that audience.

There is almost no middle ground.

Relevance, Perspective, and Audience Alignment Are Everything

Substance beats style every time. Creating content that resonates requires:

• Relevance. Does it answer a question, solve a problem, or reflect a need the audience actually has?
• Perspective. Does it provide insight or reflection that can’t be found elsewhere?
• Audience alignment. Is it designed for the people who actually care — not the hypothetical “everyone” you imagine scrolling past?

Without these, even the most elegant content will feel like noise. With them, even simple updates can cut through.

Creating Content That Connects

If there’s a takeaway for marketers, it’s this:

• Prioritize the audience’s needs over your own.
• Lead with insight, not just style.
• Focus on meaning, connection, and relevance.

AI, em dashes, or formatting are not your problems. Saturation and misaligned expectations are.

Reflection: What’s one piece of content you’ve seen recently that truly resonated with you, and why? Use that insight to guide your next piece.

It’s Time to Stop Blaming the Em Dash

It’s easy to point fingers at AI, formatting, tone, or punctuation. But surface-level elements don’t drive engagement.

Audiences have become efficient filters. They move past what feels generic, repetitive, or self-serving — instantly. Adjusting stylistic choices may change appearance, but it won’t change impact.

This is not the death of punctuation. It’s a recalibration of expectations. The ability to write clearly is no longer a competitive advantage. Perspective and relevance are.

Looking to stay connected with an RIA on a mission to create content that connects? Follow us on LinkedIn.